Influencers

It's critical that we have influencers who are good and ethical and tell the truth, and that they can make money from social media platforms. Social media platforms promise that people creating good and valid content can earn revenue from their creator funds and similar programs.

TOP GOAL: we fundamentally remove the power of X.com, TikTok, or YouTube to demonetize influencers who speak the truth about a puppet master doing blackmail of U.S. politicians or killing Charlie Kirk-like political leaders. That way, a puppet master that might be foreign has control over U.S. politicians. We need to fundamentally fix monetization so those who speak the truth to power on this issue don't get demonetized, and this is the most strategic plan to fix this fun problem fundamentally. Even if the puppet master has intelligence service power, we're still able to win over that power.

Final Fix to Monetiziation for Influencers

1. Below the section will be critical details on how the power to do this happens.
2. "Content is king" is the strategy that would work once we remove the proprietary lock, and this is what the puppet master goes after, controlling. We need to fundamentally break their lock at this level.
3. Content is king: the posts of an influencer speaking the truth. When it's true, it's very valuable content, and it should flow past any one social network's gatekeeper, censor, and censor, and get around other social network plumbing to get to the audience. This is how web traffic works. If one router tries to censor the web traffic packets, route around other routers and get to the destination. Same thing with Bitcoin transactions (if some mining nodes try to censor).
4. The proprietary lock Puppet Master uses is a social network which keeps its posts proprietary, locked up, and it can turn off the audience to an influencer. There's the censorship version of this. There is a demonetization version of this.
5. Below goes through how the lock of proprietary social networks and puppet master is broken.
6. What you finally get to is where social media posts go through what's called open standards social network tracks. These are three standards: (a. Mastadon, b. Nostr. c. Blue Sky).
7. What I have already built is an open source version of x.com called WeCitizens.Social. This is open source, like Linux, so many people can run it.
8. It uses these open standards posts, so it already has 40 million people's posts going through it because all Mastodon posts, all Blue Sky posts, and all Nostr posts come through already from all of those other places also. It's one internet, and these are just websites that use these social network open standards for posts flowing.
9. WeCitizens.Social Solves the monetization for influencers because that is a critical feature built into it: to rev share 40% of people who sign up through that account (how the 40% revenue share works), which ends up becoming a large percentage of revenue for a relatively small number of people who signed up.
10. 10,000 people who signed up from that influencer (to Premium accounts) equals $103,960 a month, or $1,247,520 a year, before refunds and fees. The math: Premium users average $25.99 a month (70% on the $19.99 plan and 30% on the $39.99 plan), and the influencer's 40% share is $10.40 a user each month. Even 1,000 sign-ups pays $10,396 a month ($124,752 a year), and 100,000 sign-ups pays $1,039,600 a month ($12,475,200 a year). See what 40% actually pays.

Monetiziation for Influencers: The Root Problem to Fix

What we have to worry about is a puppet master that may well act like Bolsheviks 2026. These are the patterns:

1. They may well work on taking power over the main social networks.
2. They're likely to close accounts, or remove monetization from accounts, that tell the truth about crimes committed by a puppet master of 2026.
3. Charlie Kirk was assassinated by some country's intelligence service. This is effectively acting like a puppet master, like Bolsheviks 2026.
4. Epstein Island was also the same thing: Bolsheviks 2026 control over politicians.
5. All of this is about a Bolsheviks 2026 equivalent of control over politicians.
6. Then this turns to control over influencers on social media who are telling the truth and pointing out the crimes of the Bolsheviks in 2025, like the murder of Charlie Kirk.
7. There have already been reports that a big percentage of the top conservative influencers in 2025 are being paid, likely by a foreign country. The social media monetization systems will keep working for them.

The strategy to fix it

8. We must have a strategy to fix this problem, and here I am presenting my strategy.
9. We The Citizens (WeTheCitizens.io) is meant to be a replacement for TPUSA. WeTheCitizens.io is non-partisan.
10. I created a social network that's open source, in order to fix the monetization problems for influencers who tell the truth.
11. WeCitizens.Social, with its Influencer Program for truth-telling creators.
12. This is open source code. It also uses an open-standards, peer-to-peer social network backbone. That way, the posts are open and transparent. That prevents censorship. The next step is that we make the algorithm transparent, to also prove there's no censorship.
13. Next comes monetization for truth-telling influencers.
14. We share 40% of revenue with the influencer from users who sign up on their portal. This becomes a very large amount of money very quickly.
15. I personally don't need monetization myself. You can see the censorship that accounts like mine and others are experiencing in the image below, where they have censored my ability to receive money from X, in the way their censorship works.

Demonetized accounts (my personal account):

Fixing Monetization for Influencers

To fix any one of these four problems, you have to fix the other three. They are not separate problems. They are four sides of the same lock, and they only come undone together.

1. Monetization for influencers. How a truth-telling creator gets paid.
2. Censorship on social media. Whether their posts reach their audience at all.
3. Replacing TPUSA with WeTheCitizens.io. Who picks the thought leaders and the challengers.
4. A plan past Charlie Kirk. What citizens do so the movement cannot be stopped by removing one leader.

1. Monetization for influencers

• WeCitizens.Social gives 40% of revenue to influencers for the people who sign up from their page. The influencer's audience is the influencer's income, and no platform sits in the middle deciding whether they "qualify" this month. See the 40% influencer revenue share and the WeCitizens.Social Influencer Program.
• WeCitizens.Social is open source, USA based, and has no VCs or investors. There is no board of outside money that can be leaned on to change the rules for one creator.
• Why demonetization happens. When a hidden power works to control US politicians, it also has to control the people who expose that control. Influencers who post about it get demonetized, censored, or both. Cutting off the money is quieter than banning the account, and it works just as well.
• WeCitizens.Social can't be bought or controlled. The code is public, the posts travel on open standards, and anyone can run a copy. There is no single owner to buy. See why a revenue share resists demonetization.
• Open standards social networking is a 1,000-year investment. It has to be the foundation that guarantees, long after any of us are gone, that no one can censor influencers who speak truth or block the payments that keep them working.

2. Censorship on social media

• The whole political social media world has to move to "Open Standards Social Media": Mastodon, Nostr, and Bluesky / ATProto. Once political speech lives on open standards, no single company holds the off switch.
• WeCitizens.Social is an open source X.com clone. It gives the power to the people who use it, and it runs on those open standards, so posts from Mastodon, Nostr, and Bluesky already flow through it.
• This is the only way truth-tellers stay heard. An influencer who speaks truth that uncovers a puppet master cannot be silenced once their posts travel on open standards, because no social media app, client, or website can block the network their posts move across. One site can refuse to show a post. It cannot stop the post from reaching everyone else.

See how a citizen's work reaches that network in publishing to the social network.

3. Replace TPUSA with WeTheCitizens.io

• WeTheCitizens.io lets all citizens find the best political challengers to replace members of Congress who sell out and are controlled by a puppet master, whether that control comes through blackmail, handlers, or money in politics. Start with the challenger profiles and replacing captured incumbents.
• An AmFest replacement where US citizens pick the thought leaders for political events, instead of an organization picking them for us.
• It is designed to give power to citizens who speak out against puppet-master problems.
• It naturally blocks sell-out influencers, FedSlop, and intelligence service manipulation. Citizens decide who is trusted, in the open, from the record, so a paid voice cannot simply be installed at the top.
• It is open three ways: open source, open data, and open AI. The code is public, the data is public, and the AI prompts are plain and easy to read. Anyone can audit it and confirm it does what it says it does.

4. A plan past Charlie Kirk

• The assassination of Charlie Kirk looks, to many citizens, like a "Bolsheviks 2025" moment. Political assassination to keep control is the last stage of a captured system, the step taken after money, blackmail, and censorship have stopped working.
• WeTheCitizens.io gives the power to the full US citizen base to fix this. Not one leader who can be removed, but millions of citizens who cannot.
• Political challengers who win in primaries. Primaries are where a captured incumbent is most exposed, and where a citizen-chosen challenger can actually take the seat.
• Fix the laws. Charlie Kirk laws, Epstein file disclosure laws, and more. See fixing the law.

This is why the four have to be fixed together. An influencer who gets paid but can be censored is not free. An influencer who can't be censored but can't earn will eventually stop. A movement with free, paid, truth-telling influencers still needs a way for citizens to pick challengers and win primaries. And all of it has to survive the loss of any one leader. WeCitizens.Social fixes the first two. WeTheCitizens.io fixes the last two.

40% Rev-share WeCitizens.Social Read details

Enter We The Citizens.io See the early version of our website

About us About us and why we built this

The plan The plan, in the We The Citizens app