Log what you did

The form

A title. What you did, in a line.

A description. Enough for a reviewer who was not there.

One or more evidence links, added one at a time. This is the field the whole system rests on: an action with no evidence is a claim, and claims do not score.

Who did this — yourself, or another citizen. Peer reporting is a first-class path, and it is the highest-quality signal in the system precisely because it is the one nobody can generate for themselves.

What it was about — the subject links, tying the action to the record it concerns.

Drafts are supported. You can start a log and finish it when the evidence arrives.

The declaration

A required choice, with no preselected answer:

( ) This action was legal and ethical.
( ) It was not, or I am not sure.

No default, deliberately. A pre-checked "yes" is an answer the app gave on your behalf, which is exactly what this control must not do.

Choosing the second option does not throw you out. The submit row is replaced, in place, with:

Then we cannot take it. We only carry action that is legal and ethical — that limit is what lets the movement stand behind everything on this page. Nothing has been sent, and nothing has been saved to your record.

Then an attestation checkbox gates Submit.

Why the limit is stated this plainly

Because the movement publishes what its citizens do. Standing behind that record is only possible if there is a line, and a line that is not stated is not a line.

There is a prohibited-conduct policy, it is linked from the form rather than buried, and the honest version of the interaction is to show it before somebody types out something we cannot carry.

What happens next

Your entry goes to review and becomes a scored completion record if verified. Points are frozen at verification. Disputes go to an adjudication queue and come back with a stated reason both parties can read.

Then it appears in your own action log, in the public feed, and in your monthly karma.